1=5 already violates the basic arithmatics,1 T" x. K, r* g$ U% ]2 j
without the basic arithmatics, we can not even say 5=1 because we dont know if = sign is commutative, therefore, 5=3125 is an answer that follows the pattern welltvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) `6 x- o1 j* Q0 Q- N. E+ C f
5 Q; j+ N9 k. K! xanyway, what is more important is the lessen behind this question作者: hugeman 時間: 2007-4-10 12:42 PM
無留心題目所以計錯 , 我去唔到哈佛大學啦 !b-(作者: skybirds 時間: 2007-4-12 04:35 AM
Dun worry guys, 哈佛 won't have such stupid question, this guys make it up, 1 will never equal to 5作者: 看我72變 時間: 2007-4-12 01:42 PM
哈哈哈~~~我答對了作者: lux1261 時間: 2007-4-13 07:01 AM
OH MY GOD !!!!!!!!!!作者: Fargon 時間: 2007-4-14 10:14 AM
hahaha so fun.....作者: curlihead 時間: 2007-4-15 04:11 AM
3125作者: kreutzer 時間: 2007-4-15 05:32 AM
完全地衰左,哈哈哈作者: SUNCLOUDY1234 時間: 2007-4-15 05:58 AM
very interesting... hahah...作者: cocaine 時間: 2007-4-15 06:25 PM
我答1!!作者: shhak47 時間: 2007-4-15 10:56 PM
没明白,什么意思啊?作者: ironeagle 時間: 2007-4-18 02:02 PM
good one作者: qyseason 時間: 2007-4-18 09:24 PM
哈哈哈``作者: fatgal5 時間: 2007-4-20 08:24 AM
man, I keep using cal to try to find out the result... P8 m6 z4 ]. N) o0 f" ]公仔箱論壇but,... I can't believe it... 5 = 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!作者: Shirley_Mak 時間: 2007-5-1 01:46 AM
wahahahah... wot a tricky one!作者: wakeup99 時間: 2007-5-11 08:08 PM